As climate ‘referee,’ IEA chief faces scrutiny
BY: ANCA GURZU
PARIS — Flanked by his staff, Fatih Birol strides briskly along a narrow hallway before rushing into a nondescript conference room to a meeting he’s late for.
Along the way, the 65-year-old silver-haired Turkish economist passes an exhibit with photos of oil drilling, gas pipelines, enormous wind turbines, electrolyzers and fast-speed trains.
The display aptly depicts the fundamental transformation both the world and the organization Birol is leading, the International Energy Agency (IEA), have embarked on in recent years: the world in how it sources its energy needs; the IEA in how it does its job — and, more contentiously, how the latter can nudge the greening of the former.
Supporters applaud the IEA’s increased focus on how to tackle climate change, arguing the organization’s metamorphosis is in line with the changing needs of its members and of society at large. Critics, however, argue the IEA — through its messaging and assumptions — has strayed from its path, sliding toward unhelpful climate advocacy.
“It is true that we went through a transformation… but this doesn't mean that we forget energy security,” Birol told Cipher in an interview on the sidelines of the IEA’s 50th anniversary event in Paris last week. “It is like when you ask the kids when they are young ‘do you love your father or mother more?’ We love both of them. We address both energy security and climate change, and this can happen at the same time.”
Click here to read the rest of an equal parts provocative and informative article from Anca.
For those with no time to spare, here are our highlights:
Changing times
The IEA, an intergovernmental organization, was founded by richer nations in 1974 as an energy security watchdog following the 1970s oil crisis. Today, the IEA also puts out reports on how countries can reach net-zero emissions by 2050, boost renewables and source critical raw materials needed for cleantech. Its work lands on the desks of prime ministers, CEOs and fund managers, and is considered the gold standard for policy planning.
The drive and dedication of Birol, a Turkish economist, has helped put the IEA on the map, many officials Cipher spoke to on and off the record said.
“Can you tell me the name of any other IEA director before him?” asked a European diplomat who participated in the Paris event and who asked to remain unnamed to speak candidly.
John Kerry, the United States’ top climate diplomat, touted Birol’s “extraordinary job,” adding in a speech at the same event that the IEA “is now probably the principal arbiter or referee about many of the things we need to be thinking about with respect to our policies."
Fossil pushback
Birol’s climate moves have also rankled some key energy players.
Just days before the 28th annual United Nations Conference of the Parties in the United Arab Emirates last year, Birol told the oil and gas industry it is “facing a moment of truth” about the role it plays in addressing climate change.
In a sharp response four days later, the Organization of Oil Producing Countries (OPEC) said the IEA’s messaging “unjustly vilifies the industry,” describing its messaging as “undiplomatic to say the least.”
Birol dismissed the idea that there was an exchange of words with the oil cartel.
“We never responded to anybody directly,” he said calmly. “We have taken with great honesty the criticism… even from a very small part of the international community.”
That criticism has been mounting lately, especially after the IEA forecasted last year demand for all fossil fuels will peak by 2030.
OPEC isn’t Birol’s only critic.
The IEA has “strayed from its security mission and it has become a lap poodle for climate zealots,” Bob McNally, an energy consultant who served as a special assistant to George W. Bush, told Cipher in an interview.
Click here to go deep on McNally’s concerns about the IEA — and the agency’s response.